Skip to main content

CIPS credentials mirage

The reason I do not have CIPS qualifications is very simple. I refuse to confuse a receipt with competence. CIPS has become very good at selling procurement knowledge back to procurement professionals at a premium, packaged as professional recognition. You are not necessarily buying superior skill. You are buying the right to place letters after your name.

A good procurement professional knows how to avoid unnecessary costs, which means knowing when not to buy, when to challenge a specification, when to negotiate before signing, when to consolidate demand and when to walk away from a supplier selling convenience at a premium. Someone who cannot recognise avoidable spending may end up paying for prestige and calling it professional development.

Depending on resources and exam choices, CIPS says that a self study candidate should budget around 1,500 to 2,000 pounds for diploma level study. Independent training service providers may charge even more and their advertised course fees do not always include CIPS membership or exam fees.  This business model is quite impressive. Take a discipline that can be learned through practice, reading and experience, then persuade professionals that they need to buy it again as a branded qualification.

This is the mighty CIPS credentials mirage. From a distance, the letters look like proof of mastery, move closer and you find membership renewals, exam fees, study materials and institutional branding standing between a professional and the title everyone is told to desire for. The mirage works because employers recognise the name, recruiters use it as a filter and CIPS benefits from the loop it helped create.

If you spend thousands of pounds on CIPS, you could instead learn procurement where it is not a PowerPoint slide but a survival skill. Work in Pakistan, Venezuela or Iran, where budgets are tight, suppliers can be unreliable, currency can move faster than approval processes and a delayed shipment can create real operational damage. There you learn negotiation, supplier risk, logistics, scarcity management, relationship management and the practical business of getting goods delivered.

Better still, those markets may pay you a salary while you gain the experience. You learn procurement by doing procurement, which is more credible than a certificate confirming that you passed an exam about procurement. In Pakistan, a Masters in Supply Chain Management costs a fraction of the CIPS route. The University of the Punjab offers an MS in Supply Chain Management and its 2026 to 2027 fee schedule lists MS and MPhil programmes in the relevant category under ~50,000 rupees per semester. Even across a two year programme, that is modest compared with the cumulative cost of CIPS study, exams, resits, materials and membership.

CIPS is the Rolls Royce of procurement credentials. It is well branded, reassuringly expensive and effective at signalling that you have arrived. But a Rolls Royce does not make you a better driver and MCIPS does not automatically make you a better buyer. The real test is whether you can secure the right goods, at the right price, from a supplier who will still answer your phone when something goes wrong.

So no, I do not have CIPS credentials. I have something less fashionable and more useful. I can recognise when an institution is selling prestige and I do not confuse paying for a title with knowing how to buy well. The CIPS credentials mirage survives because it offers certainty in a field where certainty is earned through results, not purchased through letters.


Shehroz

Disclaimer: This website/personal blog is a forum for free thought, free speech, free expression, opinion, commentary and discussion. Content published here (or elsewhere) reflects my personal views and is not intended as professional advice or as a definitive statement of fact. Readers should exercise their own judgment and independently verify claims before relying on them. I expressly disclaim and do not assume responsibility or liability for the accuracy, completeness, fairness or consequences of any claim, opinion, comment or other content that I have published (here or elsewhere, at present or in past) or may publish in the future, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law. I undertake no general duty to investigate or independently prove every statement before publication. Content posted by readers or other third parties reflects their views, not mine, and is not necessarily endorsed by me. I do not authorize anyone to impersonate me or publish on my behalf without my express permission.